The Race Is On For Amazon’s HQ2. Which Cities Are The Front-Runners?

Amazon has eaten up all of Seattle’s real estate market. The ecommerce behemoth occupies about 20 percent of the city’s total office space (Business Insider).

With nowhere left to go in Jet City, Jeff Bezos’s company is looking to invest $5 billion in a second headquarters. When proposals were due on October 23rd, 238 cities in all sent in bids.

Who are the favorites to win Amazon’s HQ2?

The betting website Paddy Power is offering bets on who will win HQ2. The site’s odds as of October 24, 2017:

[table id=6 /]

Atlanta and Austin are the early leaders. Both of these cities have established creative class professionals Amazon can tap into. Both are the state capitals, so executives can rub shoulders with local policymakers. Both cities are far cheaper than Seattle. However, both cities can do a lot to improve local infrastructure and public transportation. That’s probably a good thing for both of these car-centric cities.

While the betting markets show a sizable early lead for Atlanta and Austin, this should be taken with a grain of salt. As Matt Klein of FT Alphaville noted,

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

No matter, this will be a fun horse race to continue watching.

 

Cover photo: Doc Searls (Flickr Commons)

Weekly Wrap: The Best Part of Trump’s Tax Reform? Agreement That Deficits Don’t Matter

[su_box title=”Sign Up For Our Weekly Wrap Email” title_color=”#ffffff”]Big news: our Weekly Wrap will officially be moving over to email starting next week. Please click here to subscribe.[/su_box]

Welcome to the 12th edition of the Weekly Wrap, where our deficit of gratitude for your reading this is bottomless.

Tax Reform And Shifting Opinions

Tax reform got one step closer this week as the Senate voted 51-49 in favor of a 2018 budget. This will allow Republicans to pass a tax bill without 60 votes in the Senate. Of course, this means tax policy will be in place for a maximum of 10 years, but we’ll look past that for now.

This is great news on one particular point. Policymakers are finally realizing that deficits don’t matter. As White House Budget Director Mick Mulvaney noted (via Bloomberg),

“I’ve been very candid about this. We need to have new deficits because of that. We need to have the growth… If we simply look at this as being deficit-neutral, you’re never going to get the type of tax reform and tax reductions that you need to get to sustain 3 percent economic growth.”

The tax package “The tax measure could add as much as $1.5 trillion to budget deficits over a decade,” according to the New York Times. The massive tax cuts are being paid for (or at least somewhat offset) by eliminating or capping some popular items, like state and local taxes and retirement savings tax breaks. These mostly impact the wealthiest of taxpayers, though many middle income earners will still see tax hikes.

But getting back to debts and deficits. The United States can borrow effectively endlessly from the rest of the world. That’s why bond yields are still so low by historical standards, even though the national debt is at an all-time high and still growing. The U.S. government simply having the ability to tax the wealthiest population on earth is enough for U.S. Treasury bonds to be the ultimate safe haven. Thus, deficits and debts don’t matter.

What would be a big deal is threatening the world’s confidence in the U.S. Treasury and the dollar. Exorbitant privilege is the term economists use to describe the dollar as the world’s reserve currency (here’s former Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke on Exorbitant Privilege).

Oil is denominated for in dollars across the globe. Foreign nations borrow in dollars because it adds an air of stability to investors. Borrowing in dollars forces budgetary discipline on those governments. After all, if they have to devalue their home currency, the debts in U.S. dollars become more unsustainable.

The dollar as the world’s reserve currency is an inherent subsidy by the rest of the world to citizens of the United States. If misguided foreign policy, trade policy, or simply upsetting the apple cart just to create chaos were to threaten the dollar’s global status, Americans would feel the pinch big time.

What We Wrote This Week

The Growing Chasm Between Barcelona and Madrid: Checking in on the Catalonia Independence Referendum

“If there’s an impasse, or Puigdemont demands a hard Catalonia exit, or there are more riots in the streets between Catalonian nationalists and integrated Spanish supporters, that yield could shoot right back up.”

What Do Trump Stock Market Tweets Mean for the Fed Chair Decision?

“Trump likes to tweet about stock market milestones. But Trump also has a decision to make about who will lead the Federal Reserve. A hawkish pick for the Fed chief could increase the chances of a stock market correction.”

Why a Brexit Deal Remains a Leap of Faith: Theresa May’s Big Week of Negotiations

“Theresa May is finding out that Brexit negotiations are producing no winners. She herself, with a tenuous grip on the Prime Ministership, is feeling the burn the most.”

Watch our videos from this week

Spot Exchanges Shorts: Will Catalonia Leave Spain?

Spot Exchanges Shorts: The Apprentice: Federal Reserve Edition

Econ Vlog: Is Global Political Risk Creeping Up on Investors?

 

Cover photo: Gage Skidmore (Flickr Commons)
</script>

Why a Brexit Deal Remains a Leap of Faith: Theresa May’s Big Week of Negotiations

Might it just be better for the UK to stop negotiations and announce a hard Brexit? Is having a year and a half to prepare for a complete separation better than negotiating and waiting it out for a marginally better deal?

These are questions that UK Prime Minister Theresa May must ask herself as Brexit negotiations continue this week.

May travelled to Brussels on Monday for more Brexit talks. Through the first few rounds of meetings, progress has been slow. May and EU negotiator Michel Barnier have yet to iron out the first items on the table, including the divorce settlement paid to the European Union. A discussion on trade can’t even begin until the issues of the first round come to a close.

As the discussions drag on, May must consider the possibility of a “no deal” hard Brexit. This would be akin to ripping the bandaid off well ahead of the March 2019 deadline to leave the European Union.

The Game Theory of the Brexit Negotiations

Theresa May and Brexit Secretary David Davis have thrown around the possibility a “no deal.” The idea might be that this would give the British a better bargaining position. A hard Brexit would certainly hurt both parties, but perhaps the EU would give better terms if the British threatened to leave without any agreement in place.

That might be true, but it ignores two possibilities. First, the British have a lot more to lose than the continental Europeans. It is estimated that between 8 and 18 percent of continental EU exports go to the UK, while the UK sends 44 percent of its exports to the EU. The UK would also lose out on trade deals they are already covered by through its EU membership, so the number is really 100 percent of UK exports that are on the line. The asymmetry of the trade relationship means the British are standing closer to the cliff’s edge in negotiations.

Second, the negotiations favor the EU simply because there is a hard deadline for talks. The EU negotiators aren’t in a hurry to make a bad deal. For them, a bad deal is far worse than no deal. They will just pass the ball back and forth until the buzzer sounds if there isn’t significant action on the part of the UK.

All this uncertainty is hitting the British economy. Yields on 10-year UK bonds have jumped about 30 basis points over the past few weeks. The combination of expected rate hikes from the Bank of England and the increasing likelihood of a hard Brexit are weighing on investors.

What Happens if Theresa May and the UK Don’t Get a Brexit Deal?

Nobody really knows, but it likely wouldn’t be positive. According to an analysis by the late Financial Times journalist Paul McClean, the UK would have to renegotiate 759 treaties in a post-Brexit world. That would be quite disruptive.

In the short-term, there would be chaos for parts of the British economy, including airlines and travel, shipping and healthcare. International flights, customs, international cargo shipping and critical medical supplies that are imported from abroad would be immediately disrupted.

Over the longer-term, the British economy would have a serious adjustment to its post-globalized life. Without trade deals, it is harder for British manufacturers to sell goods abroad. The pound sterling would likely fall to offset the higher costs of foreign goods and services. According to Business Insider,

“Most… predict that sterling will drop to a range between $1.10 and $1.20. The lowest end of that spectrum would represent a 17% drop from current levels — which already mark a more than 10% from sterling’s pre-referendum high.”

Data that was released in the UK this week showed another month higher prices. Inflation increased by 3.0 percent in September, in line with forecasts. Higher inflation and lower wage growth is squeezing British residents (see: The UK Death Cross: Wage earners are feeling poorer thanks to inflation and Brexit uncertainty). A weaker pound coming out of a “no deal” Brexit will only add to that inflationary burden. Central banks have been jockeying for inflation for years. The only condition is that wages must rise faster than inflation.

Theresa May’s Leadership Challenges

Negotiations continue, but Theresa May is feeling the pressure. The Brexit negotiations unearthed a deep divide in the Tory party. Hard Brexiters won’t be satisfied with any concessions, while other mostly pro-business Tories would like to see the relationship with the continent repaired. Meanwhile, Jeremy Corbyn, himself nominally pro-Brexit, and his Labour party is gaining momentum in the fractious Parliament.

Theresa May is finding out that Brexit negotiations are producing no winners. She herself, with a tenuous grip on the Prime Ministership, is feeling the burn the most.

 

Cover photo: EU2017EE (Flickr Commons)

What Do Trump Stock Market Tweets Mean for the Fed Chair Decision?

Another stock market record, another @realDonaldTrump tweet basking in it.

Yesterday’s example: After the Dow Jones Industrial Average hit 23,000, the president tweeted “WOW!” with an animated stock chart. Trump is certainly soaking in the sunshine of an index that has gained 25% since election day.

But this enthusiasm is headed for a crossroads. Trump likes to tweet about stock market milestones. But Trump also has a decision to make about who will lead the Federal Reserve. A hawkish pick for the Fed chief could increase the chances of a stock market correction.

Who is in the lead for the next Chair of the Federal Reserve?

How we got to 23,000; or life before before Trump stock market tweets

For years, many have argued that the low interest rate policies of the Bernanke and Yellen Feds have led to high asset prices, including in stocks.

Real interest rates – measured by the 10-year Yield minus CPI – turned negative in September for the first time since February. Overall, real yields are still well below the historical norm. In the 1990s, real yields were between 3 and 5 percent. The post-crisis, historically low rate environment is one of the key components for our currently lofty market valuations.

But if Trump picks a hawk on monetary policy – someone like John Taylor or Kevin Warsh – the Fed’s baseline interest rate could be hiked faster and higher than it would under a Janet Yellen or Gary Cohn regime (Though real interest rates have actually fallen as the Fed has increased interest rates over the past two years. See: The Janet Yellen Paradox: When Raising Rates Doesn’t Equal Tighter Financial Conditions).

Could we have a hawkish Fed and continued market record highs?

History shows that markets have performed well after a rate hike cycle. According to a Charles Schwab analysis,

As shown in the chart below, the S&P 500 Index returned an average of 9.0% and 5.5% before and after, respectively, the start of a Fed rate hike campaign. In all 11 of these instances, the S&P 500 Index generated positive returns for the six months before a rate hike. Additionally, market volatility rose around the time of each initial rate increase. In spite of this volatility, the S&P 500 Index generally resumed its upward climb after the rate hikes, generating positive returns in 8 of 11 instances.

Stock prices grew slower after a rate hike, but market more often than not continued to trend upward. But let’s take this bull case with a cautiously optimistic bent. First, 11 is an incredibly small sample size, so we need to understand what happens when rates rise. Second, we have to consider what could derail the bull market.

Stock Market Correction Ingredients

First, higher interest rates mean higher discount rates.

  • Higher interest rates put downward pressure on price. All future expected earnings are discounted by the prevailing interest rate (plus a risk premium), so as rates rise, price tends to fall. In textbook finance, this is as true for bonds as it is for the broader market.

Second, higher rates could hurt earnings growth.

  • To support the current stock market levels, earnings would have to grow even faster to offset that increase in interest rates. The question is whether or not the market can support faster earnings growth.
  • Higher interest rates impact earnings in two ways. It increases the cost of capital for companies, so borrowing in the capital markets becomes more expensive. Higher rates also decrease the incentive to invest in new projects, because the return from sitting on cash is higher.

A standard market valuation is the Price-to-Earnings ratio. Higher expected earnings growth tends to lead to higher prices. Analysts are predicting double-digit earnings growth throughout 2018, according to a recent analysis by Factset. These expectations have led to the lofty market valuations – the S&P 500 Forward 12-month Price-to-Earnings ratio hit 18x earnings for the first time in 15 years.

If earnings growth falters on the back of higher rates, however, that could cause market valuations – and market prices – to tumble.

Which will win out, Twitter or Monetary Policy?

Since Trump likes Twitter, and likes to talk about how his administration’s policies are increasing stock market levels, would he really want to risk that by picking a hawk to lead the Fed?

The Fed is said to be the one who takes away the punchbowl after economic growth leads to inflation. So who does Trump choose? It is difficult to imagine that Trump would take away his own Twitter punchbowl with a hawkish choice to head the central bank.

Trump may say he loves John Taylor, but this could simply be a baseless statement to appease Republicans who distrusts the current Fed leadership. Trump is a “low-interest rate” guy who likes lofty valuations. The choice for the next chair of the Fed will probably reflect this.

The Growing Chasm Between Barcelona and Madrid: Checking in on the Catalonia Independence Referendum

The ongoing standoff between Mariano Rajoy’s Spanish government and the Catalonian regional government of Carles Puigdemont is at a stalemate. Unfortunately, the clock is still ticking.

Last week, Puigdemont gave a speech to the Catalonian parliament, saying that he would hold off on declaring independence in order to buy time to negotiate with the Spanish government. Since then, nothing has happened.

Puigdemont’s next move: The Catalonian leader gave Rajoy a 4-page paper reiterating his position that the vote is legal. Puigdemont also said that his Catalonian government would not have an answer for Spain by 10 am on Thursday. That would trigger Article 155 – allowing Madrid to suspend the Catalonian government and run the region.

[su_box title=”Want more on what is happening in Catalonia?” title_color=”#ffffff”]Check out our Catalonia Independence Referendum roundup[/su_box]

A federal takeover of an autonomous region would be a huge political and economic disruption to Spain.

For now, Puigdemont is in a difficult place. He is being squeezed from both sides – hardline Catalonia separatists on one and local businesses on the other, who are ready to flee if the independence movement succeeds. Puigdemont has argued repeatedly that the referendum vote was legal and valid, so there isn’t much of a choice to walk back from the decision.

The best option would be to return to the negotiating table and extend the talks beyond Thursday. It’s difficult to come up with a plan to split from the existing governing structure in just a week (just ask Theresa May, who gets 2+ years).

What do investors think about the Catalonian government?

Investors seem to think this is the most likely outcome – Spanish 10-year yields have fallen for four straight days, and are currently trading at 1.57 percent. This is about 25 basis points below the peak during the referendum uncertainty.

But if there’s an impasse, or Puigdemont demands a hard Catalonia exit, or there are more riots in the streets between Catalonian nationalists and integrated Spanish supporters, that yield could shoot right back up.

 

Cover photo: Sasha Popovic (Flickr Commons)

(Update) Weekly Wrap: Inflation is the New Jobs Report

This was first published on Facebook. To get the Weekly Wrap hot off the press, please like us on Facebook.

Welcome to the 11th edition of the Weekly Wrap, where we love all economic data points equally, as if they were our own children.

Inflation: More Important than Jobs Data?


Update: 9am ET

A weak CPI reading. Core CPI for September was released, and came in at 1.7 percent, 0.1 percent lower than expected. Traders are now predicting an 82 percent chance for a December rate hike, down from 86 percent earlier this morning.


At 8:30 am (ET) this morning, we’ll get to see the updated Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation number for September. The monthly jobs report has traditionally been the granddaddy of economic data. But this monthly inflation metric might be the new king of the heap.

  • The Fed has a dual mandate: full employment and stable prices. Even with the hiccup in the September jobs report (-55,000 net jobs, the first monthly decline since 2010), the economy is pretty close to full employment.
  • Low inflation has is the biggest source of disagreement within the central bank, according to the minutes from the September Fed meeting. Inflation was mentioned 90 times in the discussions. That’s more than 3x the number of mentions of “labor.”

Does this mean the Fed will hike rates in December?

According to the market, the answer is a resounding yes. Traders are pricing in an 86 percent chance of a rate hike in December. That’s up from about 70 percent on October 2 and 42 percent on August 18.

That’s in spite of the apprehensions of some Fed statements. Some members of the committee “noted that, in light of the uncertainty around their outlook for inflation, their decision on whether to take such a policy action would depend importantly on whether the economic data in coming months increased their confidence that inflation was moving up toward the Committee’s objective.”

Which brings us back to this morning’s CPI report. Would the Fed hold off on a December rate hike with low inflation readings? Probably not – low inflation hasn’t stopped the Fed from increasing rates before. But it is clear that monetary policymakers are keeping a much closer eye on the inflation side of the dual mandate.

What We Wrote This Week

[su_posts id=”360, 378, 380″ posts_per_page=”-1″ order=”desc”][Posts shortcode][/su_posts] 

Other Links and Notes

Conor Sen argues in Bloomberg View that we should look past inflation – housing is the real crisis. (Don’t Worry About Inflation. Solve the Housing Shortage.;Conor Sen, Bloomberg View)

  • “The more responsive approach would be to make it easier to build houses, to get public sector employers out of their recession-era mindsets to hire and pay more, and more generally, to ensure that millennial family needs are met by the public and private sector. The way to resolve a supply shortage in this case should mean creating more supply. Rather than hiking interest rates, the federal government should find ways to add construction workers, perhaps via worker training programs or immigration reform.”

Yanis Varoufakis, everyone’s favorite finance minister, argues that we shouldn’t let the Catalonia crisis go to waste. (Spain’s Crisis is Europe’s Opportunity; Yanis Varoufakis, Project Syndicate)

  • “The Catalonia crisis is a strong hint from history that Europe needs to develop a new type of sovereignty, one that strengthens cities and regions, dissolves national particularism, and upholds democratic norms… But the longer-term beneficiary of this new type of sovereignty would be Europe as a whole. Imagining a pan-European democracy is the prerequisite for imagining a Europe worth saving.”

Workers quitting their jobs to seek out better ones. Could this be what’s holding back wage growth? (Record Job Openings Aren’t Enticing Workers to Quit; Eric Morath, Wall Street Journal Real-Time Economics)

  • “The unwillingness to quit could be a factor holding back better wage growth, reflecting workers’ relative lack of bargaining power. It might also suggest other factors—such as the unwillingness to move for work, or satisfaction with work-life balance—is keeping workers in their jobs despite ample opportunities elsewhere.”

Cover photo: Brookings Institution (Flickr Commons)

YouTube, Instagram and WhatsApp: Exceptions, Not Rules, to Productivity Growth

The narrative is fantastic. A software entrepreneur launches a service, hires a few dozen staff to get it off the ground, then sells it to a big tech company for billions.

The backstories of YouTube and Instagram are legendary. It’s the stuff that Silicon Valley dreams are made of. As Edward Luce notes in his book The Retreat of Western Liberalism,

“In 2006, Google bought YouTube for $1.65 billion. It had sixty-five employees, so the price amounted to $25 million per employee. In 2012, Facebook bought Instagram, which had thirteen employees, for $1 billion. That came out to $77 million per employee. In 2014, it bought WhatsApp, with fifty-five employees, for $19 billion, at a staggering $345 million per employee.”


Productivity growth measures the output per hour of labor. If YouTube can create billions of dollars of value with a minimal amount of human input, that is an astronomic level of productivity, at the firm-level. But YouTube, Instagram and WhatsApp are more of the exception than the rule. If anything, it is getting harder to discover the game changing technologies that push business and the economy forward.
[su_box title=”Econ Book Reviews” title_color=”#ffffff”]Read our review of Edward Luce’s book, The Retreat of Western Liberalism[/su_box]
In a recent article “Wearied science,” the Economist columnist Ryan Avent writes that it is becoming harder, not easier, to discover new ideas. A team of economists at Stanford and MIT argue that new ideas are becoming more expensive to uncover. Avent says,

“As the authors acknowledge, squeezing oranges dry is not a problem if new oranges keep arriving: ie, if new lines of research appear even as others are exhausted. Yet they reckon that, across the economy as a whole, the notion that the cost of ideas is rising holds true. Since the 1930s, the effective number of researchers at work has increased by a factor of 23. But annual growth in productivity has declined.”

We have seen this slowing productivity growth across the world. In the United States, an estimate from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows that productivity actually fell by 0.1 percent in 2016. That has risen to an average of +0.8 percent in the first two quarters of 2017. As a benchmark, productivity has risen 2.1 percent on average since 1947.

Data: BLS
In the U.K., the situation is worse. As Gavin Jackson of the Financial Times recently wrote, “The figures were released alongside the latest labour productivity numbers, which found that Britain’s productivity was growing at the slowest rate since the invention of the spinning jenny.”

Productivity: What makes your life better than it was before

Since productivity is ultimately what makes people better off, this is a big problem. As Paul Krugman once quipped, “Productivity isn’t everything, but, in the long run, it is almost everything.” If it takes more money and more manpower to come up with the next big technology,  those costs will have to be passed onto consumers. Some ideas might work in practice, but might not be economical. Without a way to justify the commercial viability of many productivity-enhancing technologies, some useful ideas might collect dust on research lab shelves.

It is beginning to look more like YouTube and Instagram were the low-hanging fruit of the digital world. Giant platforms like Google and Facebook were able to leverage them to become the indispensable, ubiquitous products they now are.

But the next game-changing app or technology could to require a lot more engineers, and a lot more money. The problem isn’t that robots are taking over the world, rather they might not be taking it over fast enough.

 

Cover photo: Maurizio Pesce (Flickr Commons)